Dragi Dusko,
Pisem Vam povodom Vaseg teksta “Je li Stepinac
nedodirljiv?” objavljenog u SD od 19.04.05.
http://www.slobodnadalmacija.com/20050419/kolumne02.asp
Vjerojatno je do vas vec stigla reakcija na
“vase” razmisljanje o Stepincu (stavljam rijec
vase u navodnike jer ga sami pripisujete
Pilselu) koju je napisao g. Nenad Bach:
http://www.croatianworld.net/CROWNframes.htm?http://www.croatianworld.net/Letters/5212.htm
Nadovezujuci se na Nenadovu reakciju, kao dobar
izvor informacija koji bi mogao posluziti za
sintezu znanja umjesto za prepisivanje tudjeg
neprovjerenog teksta (kao sto Nenad dobro
predlaze) ponudio bih slijedece stranice:
http://www.croatianhistory.net/etf/jews.html
O bjelosvjetskim hohstaplerima (koji su bili
povod Vaseg clanka) i njihovoj istini moze se
puno saznati iz usporedbe danasnjih napisa New
York Timesa sa onima pisanim kratko nakon II
Svjetskog rata:
http://www.croatianworld.net/CROWNframes.htm?http://www.croatianworld.net/Letters/5184.htm
No meni je Vas clanak napose zanimljiv redi
nekoliko nejasnoca koje se svode na pitanje –
sto to novinara Pilsela cini znacajnim za ovu
raspravu? U clanku, kao razlog navodite svoju
nevjerodostojnost i Pilselovu vjerodostojnost. A
jedno i drugo obrazlozeno je na slijedeci nacin:
“…ja
sam svoju najbolju snagu uložio u projekt
socijalizma, i, via facti, politički se svrstao
uz progonitelje Stepinca. Stoga je
vjerodostojnije kad o istoj temi piše Drago
Pilsel, odgajan u proustaškoj emigraciji,
prvoborac za slobodu Hrvatske, kandidat
teologije koji se borbi za ljudska prava
posvetio pod egidom katoličkog univerzalizma —
"Amica Croatia, magis amica veritas". “
Ovi razlozi otvaraju slijedeca pitanja:
Koliko po Vasoj ocjeni ima onih koji su se borbi
za ljudska prava posvetili pod egidom katoličkog
univerzalizma — "Amica Croatia, magis amica
veritas"? a koji se slazu s Pilselom? Ako
vjerojatno nijedan, sto to Pilsela cini iznimkom
vrijednom paznje? Jeli to sto nikad nije zavrsio
teologiju (sto znaci “kandidat teologije”?).
Nije valjda taj neuspjeh jedan od njegovih
pluseva?
Ili je mozda kruna dokaza njegove
vjerodostojnosti to sto je “odgajan u
proustaškoj emigraciji”? Ako je to, drzite li da
su pripadnici te “prostaske emigracije” i inace
vjerodostojan izvor informacija, ili su to samo
onih nekoliko koji su se transformirali (u nekoj
varijaciji smjerova) iz komunista u ustese i
onda u ultraljeve globaliste (kao npr Mesic) ili
(uz preskakanje komunisticke faze) kao Pilsel?
Vezano za termin “proustaske emigracije” na
kraju me cisto zanima i jeli za vas koji ste
“svoju najbolju snagu uložili u projekt
socijalizma, i, via facti, politički se svrstali
uz progonitelje Stepinca” ikad i postojala neka
druga Hrvatska emigracija osim “proustaske”?
Tesko da jest jer su 50 godina i Hrvati u
domovini bili ustase dok nisu dokazali suprotno
upisivanjem u KPJ. A to su u ocima svjetskih
hohstaplera i domacih globalista cini se i danas
samo ako se sjecaju sto se dogadjalo u Hrvatskoj
pred niti 15 godina. Da ne spominjem svih 50.
Primite lijepe pozdrave iz neustaske emigracije
Dr. Zdeslav Hrepic
Assistant Professor
Physics Department
Fort Hays State University
600 Park Street
Hays, KS 67601
E-mail:
zhrepic@fhsu.edu
Web:
http://www.fhsu.edu/~zhrepic/
-----------------
http://www.croatianworld.net/CROWNframes.htm?http://www.croatianworld.net/Letters/5212.htm
Stepinac i
skidanje svetaca onozemaljskih
Sloboda govora ne dopusta nikome da vice "VATRA"
u punom kazalistu.
glavniurednik@slobodnadalmacija.hr
http://www.slobodnadalmacija.com/20050419/kolumne02.asp
Postovani Urednice,
Vas clanak o Stepincu gospodina Marovica, govori
o puno stvari. Jedna koja se mozda teze cita
izmedju redova je ta da se sustavno skidaju
onozemaljski svetci, nebi li "ovozemaljski"
izgledali veci. Katolicka crkva nije bez grijeha,
ali ni bez vrlina. Te vrline se tako rijetko
spominju, a insinuacije o ljudima koji su zaista
blizu svetome se rasprostiru ne samo pred kucnim
vratima, vec i naokolo. Umjesto da reagirate na
CNN vi se pridruzujete mediokritetima svijeta
koji nemaju cak ni intelektualne sposobnosti
analize i interpretacije vec samo kopiranja
postojeceg. Bez sinteze znanja. Nekad je
novinarstvo bilo vezano za intelektualnu
znatizelju. Danas se to svodi na prepisivanje
tudjeg neprovjerenog i vrlo cesto suprotno
istini orijentiranog teksta.
Nenad Bach, New York
Sloboda govora ne dopusta nikome da vice "VATRA"
u punom kazalistu.
------------------------------
http://www.croatianworld.net/CROWNframes.htm?http://www.croatianworld.net/Letters/5184.htm
The same NYT
published on October 15, 1946 quite different
story:" When the Nazis occupied Croatian
Archbishop Stepinac risked his life to aid the
Jews.
From: hmfgsf@juno.com
To: letters@nytimes.com
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005
Subject: Cardinal Stepinac, New York Times.
4.3.2005.
Dear Editor:
As Croatians, we are outraged that the New York
Times would print a statement regarding
Croatia's Cardinal Stepinac's beatification by
Pope John Paul as incensing his critics -
because Stepinac was the archbishop of Zagreb,
Croatia, during WWII, - while you fail to
mention that he saved many Jews at his own peril
during the Nazi puppet state and opposed racism
of any kind. Please compare your article with
the article of the NYT of Oct 15, 1946 where you
wrote the truth about Cardinal Stepinac with
this statement:
"When the Nazis occupied Croatia, Archbishop
Stepinac risked his life to aid the Jews. With
his aid, hundreds of Jews were smuggled out of
the country. He denounced the race laws. He
worked with the International Red Cross to
rescue Jews in other countries, concealed these
victims of racism under his own roof and many of
his priests did likewise." You might be
interested in the quote by Louis Breiner,
President of the American Jewish Society
after the show trial conviction of Cardinal
Stepinac in Tito's Yugoslavia: "He was one of
the few people in Europe who spoke out against
Nazi tyranny, at all hours, when it was
dangerous..."
In addition, you are coming up with the utterly
false number of 700,000 Serbs, Jews and others
sent to death in camps in Croatia. Even one
innocent victim is one too many, but the number
long established as correct is between 60,000 to
80,000 in camps, while one million perished in
WWII in Yugoslavia, most of them as combatants,
Croats, Serbs and Bosnian Muslims. So let's not
bandy about ad nauseam with numbers instilled by
communist Yugoslavia ruled by the Serbs. It is
obvious that Serb propaganda against Croatia
still flourishes today, even in a respected
newspaper as the NYT.
Sincerely,
Hilda M. Foley
National Federation of Croatian Americans
Santa Ana, CA 92705
714 832-0289
All-Embracing Man of Action for a New Era of
Papacy
Published: April 3, 2005 (from page 9) NYT
The pope acknowledged as much, but failed to
mollify critics, who were also incensed by his
beatification of Cardinal Alojzije Stepinac, the
archbishop of Zagreb during World War II, when a
Nazi puppet regime ruled Croatia and 700,000
Serbs, Jews and others were sent to death camps.
HOWEVER this was published in NYT on 10/15/1946.
The same NYT published on October 15, 1946 quite
different story:" When the Nazis occupied
Croatian Archbishop Stepinac risked his life to
aid the Jews. With his aid hundreds of Jews were
smuggled out of the country and obtained the
repeal of an order that all Jews must wear a
yellow tag. He denounced the Nazi race laws. He
worked with the International red Cross to
rescue Jews in other countries, concealed these
victims of racism under his own roof, and many
of his priests did likewise.
